[tulip] asix supported, or not? 2.4 problems
Donald Becker
becker@scyld.com
Mon Jul 29 15:28:02 2002
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Brett Dikeman wrote:
> Setup is a dell laptop, kernel 2.4.18, and two 16-bit pcmcia
> nic's...both Linksys PCMPC100 cards(one is a V3, the other is a V2.)
The 16 bit cards are NE2000 clones. Although PCMCIA has the capability
to operate at 8MB/sec transfer rate, most implementation operate as
slower than ISA speeds (5.33MB/sec).
The ASIX chip is basically a NE2000 design, with a faster serializer and
a MII transceiver. You shouldn't expect much more than 10Mbps performance.
> cards(the V3 I believe), I get tons and tons of errors under even
> slight(100kB/sec) load, eventually the interface just completely
> stops responding to the world(anywhere from 10 minutes to an hour or
> two)...
That shouldn't happen. Check that the link partner isn't set to
forced-full-duplex mode.
> I decided to give the tulip driver a try, since it supports(if I
> understand correctly) the chipset(s) used in both cards.
Nope. The Tulip driver supports the 88140 ASIX chip, which is a
32 bit chip with a completely different design.
> I've even tried switching to the pcmcia-cs package, which seems to
> have broken every pcmcia related script on the box.
For years the PCMCIA-cs system was the standard. When the functionality
was gradually moved into the kernel, the interface changed repeatedly.
> What am I doing wrong here? I've been using linux on laptops, with
> the tulip driver, for years, and all I remember was "compile, insmod,
> done"...I don't remember it being this hard :-)
--
Donald Becker becker@scyld.com
Scyld Computing Corporation http://www.scyld.com
410 Severn Ave. Suite 210 Second Generation Beowulf Clusters
Annapolis MD 21403 410-990-9993