[tulip] Re: tulip + 2.4

[Matthew]

Another to make sure you have is the latest modutils package.....The
latest it 2.4.2

Matt

On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Dave Turner wrote:

> Try compiling using kgcc rather than gcc and see if that makes a difference.
> Also, put -I/usr/src/linux/include in your compile command line.  I had
> similar errors and those two changes got the source to compile.  FWIW, this
> information is on the scyld.com site under "Redhat 7.0 Instructions" or
> somesuch.  I didn't see it the first time around either, but it is there in
> plain site.
>
> Dave
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <tulip-admin@scyld.com>
> To: <tulip@scyld.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 9:00 AM
> Subject: tulip digest, Vol 1 #192 - 2 msgs
>
>
> >
> > Send tulip mailing list submissions to
> > tulip@scyld.com
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the web, visit
> > http://www.scyld.com/mailman/listinfo/tulip
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > tulip-request@scyld.com
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > tulip-admin@scyld.com
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
> > "Re: Contents of tulip digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >   1. tulip + 2.4? (Matthew S. Eaton)
> >   2. Re: tulip + 2.4? (Matthew)
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:00:30 -0500
> > From: "Matthew S. Eaton" <matthewe@virginia.edu>
> > Organization: University of Virginia
> > To: tulip@scyld.com
> > Subject: [tulip] tulip + 2.4?
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Should the tulip driver compile/run on 2.4 kernels?
> >
> > Compilation with 2.4.1 :
> >
> > tulip.c: In function `tulip_open':
> > tulip.c:1488: structure has no member named `tbusy'
> > tulip.c:1489: structure has no member named `start'
> > tulip.c: In function `tulip_start_xmit':
> > tulip.c:2607: structure has no member named `tbusy'
> > tulip.c:2640: structure has no member named `tbusy'
> > tulip.c: In function `tulip_interrupt':
> > tulip.c:2659: structure has no member named `interrupt'
> > tulip.c:2663: structure has no member named `interrupt'
> > tulip.c:2744: structure has no member named `tbusy'
> > tulip.c:2748: structure has no member named `tbusy'
> > tulip.c:2749: `NET_BH' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > tulip.c:2749: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > tulip.c:2749: for each function it appears in.)
> > tulip.c:2845: structure has no member named `interrupt'
> > tulip.c: In function `tulip_close':
> > tulip.c:2991: structure has no member named `start'
> > tulip.c:2992: structure has no member named `tbusy'
> > tulip.c: In function `tulip_get_stats':
> > tulip.c:3031: structure has no member named `start'
> > tulip.c: In function `set_rx_mode':
> > tulip.c:3303: structure has no member named `tbusy'
> >
> >
> > I would use the native 2.4.1 tulip driver included with the kernel. but:
> > i get a bunch of these:
> > NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
> > eth0: Transmit timed out, status fc664010, CSR12 00000000, resetting...
> >
> > so I prefer the high performance one's here better :-)
> >
> > --
> > Matthew S. Eaton
> > Undergraduate
> > University of Virginia
> > School of Engineering and Applied Science
> >
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > Message: 2
> > From: Matthew <matthew@psychohorse.com>
> > Reply-To: matthew@psychohorse.com
> > To: "Matthew S. Eaton" <matthewe@virginia.edu>, tulip@scyld.com
> > Subject: Re: [tulip] tulip + 2.4?
> > Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:35:27 -0800
> > charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > No problems here at the moment....However I had to build the module into
> the
> > kernel, which I should do anyway I guess. The tulip.o module ended up in
> its
> > own directory under net. Was that normal? I have no idea what normal is
> > though with this kernel.
> >
> > What distribution are you using??
> >
> > Matt
> > On Tuesday 30 January 2001 06:00 pm, Matthew S. Eaton wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Should the tulip driver compile/run on 2.4 kernels?
> > >
> > > Compilation with 2.4.1 :
> > >
> > > tulip.c: In function `tulip_open':
> > > tulip.c:1488: structure has no member named `tbusy'
> > > tulip.c:1489: structure has no member named `start'
> > > tulip.c: In function `tulip_start_xmit':
> > > tulip.c:2607: structure has no member named `tbusy'
> > > tulip.c:2640: structure has no member named `tbusy'
> > > tulip.c: In function `tulip_interrupt':
> > > tulip.c:2659: structure has no member named `interrupt'
> > > tulip.c:2663: structure has no member named `interrupt'
> > > tulip.c:2744: structure has no member named `tbusy'
> > > tulip.c:2748: structure has no member named `tbusy'
> > > tulip.c:2749: `NET_BH' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > tulip.c:2749: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > > tulip.c:2749: for each function it appears in.)
> > > tulip.c:2845: structure has no member named `interrupt'
> > > tulip.c: In function `tulip_close':
> > > tulip.c:2991: structure has no member named `start'
> > > tulip.c:2992: structure has no member named `tbusy'
> > > tulip.c: In function `tulip_get_stats':
> > > tulip.c:3031: structure has no member named `start'
> > > tulip.c: In function `set_rx_mode':
> > > tulip.c:3303: structure has no member named `tbusy'
> > >
> > >
> > > I would use the native 2.4.1 tulip driver included with the kernel. but:
> > > i get a bunch of these:
> > > NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
> > > eth0: Transmit timed out, status fc664010, CSR12 00000000, resetting...
> > >
> > > so I prefer the high performance one's here better :-)
> >
> >
> >
> > --__--__--
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tulip mailing list
> > tulip@scyld.com
> > http://www.scyld.com/mailman/listinfo/tulip
> >
> >
> > End of tulip Digest
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tulip mailing list
> tulip@scyld.com
> http://www.scyld.com/mailman/listinfo/tulip
>