[Fwd: Re: 32-port gigabit switch]
Eray Ozkural
exa at ttnet.net.tr
Thu Mar 6 20:52:26 PST 2003
On Friday 07 March 2003 01:18, Justin Moore wrote:
> > Additionally the latency on Gigabit is simply to high for large
> > clusters. Remember on clusters latency is more important than
> > throughput.
>
> Be careful ... I think I hear Rob Brown furiously typing up an "it
> depends" response (and I'm a few buildings away). You shouldn't say
> these kinds of things on the beowulf list unless your mail server is
> ready to be "rgb-dot'ed". :)
>
It depends on the application :)
Actually throughput is more important than latency in many cases I believe.
And of course while it is not too difficult using common programming
techniques to optimize for high throughput high latency it would be much
harder to do so with low throughput low latency don't you think? :)
Thanks,
--
Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo at cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo Malfunction: http://mp3.com/ariza
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C
More information about the Beowulf
mailing list