gromacs benchmark and quad Xeons
Richard Walsh
rbw at ahpcrc.org
Tue Jun 18 14:28:04 PDT 2002
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 02:14:02PM -0400, Velocet wrote:
...
> Are the original rpms for gromacs which are generally compiled for P2/MMX
> going to be absolutely the worst possible situation for a Xeon? Or should
> they work relatively near best-speed (minus missing SSE and SSE2 instructions,
> though I dont even know if GCC gives the full set of either for a hand
> compile).
>
> What's wrong here? Any ideas?
My first reaction is to wonder what your memory foot print is ...
the bandwidth of all quad's I have seen (except the ES-45 with
Compaq's typhoon chipset and cross-bar) has been lousy. If you
are not running mostly/completely in cache this could be an
issue. Competition from all four CPUs for bandwidth could kill
performance.
Have your tried running on one CPU? Can you shrink the test
case to make sure it is cache and then look at the performance?
How does stream performanc on this quad?
rbw
#---------------------------------------------------
# Richard Walsh
# Project Manager, Cluster Computing, Computational
# Chemistry and Finance
# netASPx, Inc.
# 1200 Washington Ave. So.
# Minneapolis, MN 55415
# VOX: 612-337-3467
# FAX: 612-337-3400
# EMAIL: rbw at networkcs.com, richard.walsh at netaspx.com
# rbw at ahpcrc.org
#
#---------------------------------------------------
# "What you can do, or dream you can, begin it;
# Boldness has genius, power, and magic in it."
# -Goethe
#---------------------------------------------------
# "Without mystery, there can be no authority."
# -Charles DeGaulle
#---------------------------------------------------
# "Why waste time learning when ignornace is
# instantaneous?" -Thomas Hobbes
#---------------------------------------------------
# "In the chaos of a river thrashing, all that water
# still has to stand in line." -Dave Dobbyn
#---------------------------------------------------
More information about the Beowulf
mailing list