[Beowulf] Again about NUMA (numactl and taskset)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Chris Samuel csamuel at vpac.orgTue Jun 24 16:19:37 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Again about NUMA (numactl and taskset)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Again about NUMA (numactl and taskset)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- "Greg Lindahl" <lindahl at pbm.com> wrote: > > > Your MPI (and OpenMP) should do this for you. > > > > Although not always correctly, it may assume that it can > > allocate from core 0 onwards leading to odd performance > > issues if you happen to get two 4 CPU jobs running on the > > same node.. > > Most clusters I've seen aren't used that way (whole nodes only), I don't know of a single cluster in Australia that's managed that way, presumably because there's far less money for such systems than elsewhere and we have to try and do a lot more with a lot less (we can't afford to waste idle CPUs). The Australian state of the art peak computing facility in Canberra just dropped out of the Top500 for instance. > but sure, you can always consult the manual in that case. IIRC this was with MVAPICH and we had to consult the source to find the undocumented environment variable to fix it. :) We switched to OpenMPI and use Torque's 2.6 kernel cpuset support instead, with local patches. cheers, Chris -- Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing P.O. Box 201, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia VPAC is a not-for-profit Registered Research Agency
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Again about NUMA (numactl and taskset)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Again about NUMA (numactl and taskset)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
