Beowulf [& VMWare]

Donald Becker becker at
Thu Nov 7 14:39:49 PST 2002

On 7 Nov 2002, Timothy H. Keitt wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 13:45, Donald Becker wrote:
> > On 31 Oct 2002, Timothy H. Keitt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 13:30, Donald Becker wrote:
> > > VMware aside, I'm not aware that openmosix precludes the use of mpi or
> > > pvm or standard batch processing. Are these not good solutions for
> > > scalable or performance-oriented clustering?

I read that as repeating the claim that openmosix is a good solution,
rather than simply that it's possible to ignore openmosix on the
machine.  If you are ignore it, why even bring it up?

> > The features Mosix provides are
> >   single point application updates
> >   single process space view
> > Scyld Beowulf provides these at much lower CPU overhead.
> My point was that you don't _have_ to use the automatic process
> migration on an openmosix cluster, you can do whatever load balancing
> you want in your mpi (or other) code.

You don't get any benefit from openmosix, only costs:
   Openmosix adds some overhead, albeit not much when unused.
   Openmosix might still move a process away from its machine during CPU
     intensive phases of the computation,

Donald Becker				becker at
Scyld Computing Corporation
410 Severn Ave. Suite 210		Scyld Beowulf cluster system
Annapolis MD 21403			410-990-9993

More information about the Beowulf mailing list