disadvantages of linux cluster - admin
bogdan.costescu at iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
Thu Nov 7 04:38:09 PST 2002
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Maurice Hilarius wrote:
> The Tyan DOA rate is high, but once in service are the same or lower than
> most Intel boards, so I can't buy into the reliability claim.
Here I have to back RGB's side: 2 out of 16 Tyan 2462 mainboards died
after several months of perfect functioning. And these are the only 2
mainboards that ever died in my 4 years of sysadmin here.
> Also, the way some people throw around how "Athlons use a lot of power and
> make heat" or "Tyans use a lot of power" are simply propagating urban
> legends (a legend that Intel does everything it can to fuel).
I would not phrase it like that, but rather "Athlon based nodes are more
sensible to temperature". In a small computer room we gathered close to
150 nodes and because of the poor A/C unit(s), the temperature would go to
over 30 degrees Celsius. More than half of the nodes and some other
computers in the room (like our file-server!) which are Intel-based (but
only PII and PIII) were never affected by the temperature, while the
Athlon-based were randomly crashing; when lowering the temperature in the
room to close to 20 degrees Celsius, the same Athlon-based nodes worked
perfectly in the same load conditions. Are the tolerances in the overall
system design larger in Intel's case ?
Please note that when I wrote about "affected by temperature" I didn't
take into consideration the dead fans and that I was talking about
"Athlon-based systems" and not Athlon processors per-se.
IWR - Interdisziplinaeres Zentrum fuer Wissenschaftliches Rechnen
Universitaet Heidelberg, INF 368, D-69120 Heidelberg, GERMANY
Telephone: +49 6221 54 8869, Telefax: +49 6221 54 8868
E-mail: Bogdan.Costescu at IWR.Uni-Heidelberg.De
More information about the Beowulf