Scyld and GPL
agrajag at scyld.com
Wed Aug 22 10:34:28 PDT 2001
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Eric T. Miller wrote:
> I am risking a good flaming here, but I think it's worth it.
> This is in regard to ilker ARABACI's post, and my own experience in looking
> for an ISO image.
The GPL refers to the source, not the ISO image, and the source is
> Since Scyld is built on top of Red Hat, isn't it subject to the GPL just
> like any other Linux distribution? It is my understanding that if any
> previous code is used to develop a new distribution, then it is clearly a
> product of the GPL and should be made freely (and easily) available. Please
> correct and educate me if I am wrong!
That code is freely and easily available from
> If this is the case, however, will we see the download links given equal
> billing with the commercial (pay) links on Scyld's homepage? This seems to
> be the status quo with all other major Linux distros. I think many
> potential clustering enthusiasts are put off at first by the "fog" that
> surrounds getting your hands on the Scyld software. This is not indicative
> of the sense of community fostered by the whole of the Linux family.
I don't ever recall seeing a link from Red Hat's website to where you
can download their software. And for kicks I just went back to their
website and I am still unable to find a link to where you can download
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20010822/2a6ebe75/attachment.bin
More information about the Beowulf