[tulip] Problem with 21041

[Shawn Nycz]

I'm running an old SMC EtherPower card with a 21041 chip.  The last
version which works for me is 0.9.14.  If I try to use any driver after
that (incl. 1.1.8), the card does not come up.  The link light on the card
(and hub) remains off and nothing happens.  

Output from tulip-diag -aa for the working 0.9.14 driver follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------
tulip-diag.c:v2.06 1/8/2001 Donald Becker (becker@scyld.com)
 http://www.scyld.com/diag/index.html
Index #1: Found a Digital DC21041 Tulip adapter at 0x6600.
Digital DC21041 Tulip chip registers at 0x6600:
 0x00: ffe08000 ffffffff ffffffff 0908f000 0908f200 fc000112 fffe0200
fffe0000
 0x40: fffe0000 ffff4bf8 ffffffff fffe0000 000001c8 ffffef05 ffffff3f
ffff0008
 Port selection is full-duplex.
 Transmit stopped, Receive stopped, full-duplex.
  The Rx process state is 'Stopped'.
  The Tx process state is 'Stopped'.
  The transmit unit is set to store-and-forward.
  The NWay status register is 000001c8.
  Internal autonegotiation state is 'Autonegotiation disabled'.
--------------------------------------------------------------------


And output from the same command under the 1.1.8 driver:

--------------------------------------------------------------------
tulip-diag.c:v2.06 1/8/2001 Donald Becker (becker@scyld.com)
 http://www.scyld.com/diag/index.html
Index #1: Found a Digital DC21041 Tulip adapter at 0x6600.
Digital DC21041 Tulip chip registers at 0x6600:
 0x00: ffe08000 ffffffff ffffffff 0908f000 0908f200 fc000112 fffe0200
fffe0000
 0x40: fffe0000 ffff4bf8 ffffffff fffe0000 000051c8 ffffef01 ffffffff
ffff0008
 Port selection is full-duplex.
 Transmit stopped, Receive stopped, full-duplex.
  The Rx process state is 'Stopped'.
  The Tx process state is 'Stopped'.
  The transmit unit is set to store-and-forward.
  The NWay status register is 000051c8.
  Internal autonegotiation state is 'Negotiation complete'.
--------------------------------------------------------------------


Any ideas?  I don't mind using 0.9.4 but I thought the maintainers would
want to know.  If there's anything I can do to help, let me know.

Thanks in advance,
Shawn