[tulip] Limited success with Netgear FA310TX problem

[Paul Bombach]

I have tried the following options 100baseTx, 100baseTx-FD, 10baseT,
10baseT-FD all to no avail. I did notice however, that unless I needed to
power down my switch each time I changed options on the tulip driver. When I
first discovered this, I thought I has solved it. This however, still didn't
fix the problem. Does anyone have any suggestions? I'm seriously considering
just buying a new NIC.

Thanks

Paul Bombach
-----Original Message-----
From: tulip-admin@scyld.com [mailto:tulip-admin@scyld.com]On Behalf Of
David Winter
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 7:30 PM
To: Paul Bombach
Cc: tulip@scyld.com
Subject: Re: [tulip] Limited success with Netgear FA310TX problem



Hi Paul --

Congrats that you got it working in some form.  Given that we've narrowed it
down to some sort of initialization, I would imagine the answer may lie in
trying different options to the driver (in particular half/full duplex).
You
had mentioned that you were looking into different tulip options -- did you
have a chance to try that?  If that led nowhere, perhaps there is something
in
the code itself that needs to be hacked... but that would be where my
experience with the driver pretty much ends. :)

Dave

On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Paul Bombach wrote:

> Thanks to all that sent responses (in particular Dave Winter) about the
> problem with the Netgear FA310TX problem I posted last week. I'm still
> experiencing problems but have had some limited success. When I connect my
> Linux box with the FA310TX NIC directly to another box using a crossover
> cable, everything works just fine. However, when I try to connect my Linux
> machine with the FA310TX to a Linksys Cable Modem Router/Switch (befsr41),
I
> get no success at all. Dave Winter pointed out that NIC cards based on the
> Lite-ON PNIC 82c168 have a problem with this particular switch. This leads
> me to 2 questions:
>
>     1. What exactly is the interaction between the NIC and the switch?
>     2. Why would the NIC function under Windows 95 but not under Linux.
What
> sort of
> 	 initialization difference is there between W95 and Linux?
>
> Thanks in advance for any help.
>
> Paul Bombach
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tulip mailing list
> tulip@scyld.com
> http://www.scyld.com/mailman/listinfo/tulip
>

========================================================================
David L. Winter, Capt. USAF                          winter@alum.mit.edu
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Columbia University      Nevis Laboratories      AFRL/Rome Research Site
City of New York         Irvington, NY           Rome, NY
Phone: 212-854-4653      Phone: 914-591-2836     Phone: 315-330-3143
Fax:   212-854-3379      Fax:   914-591-8120     Fax:   315-330-7901
              WWW: http://www.nevis.columbia.edu/~winter

 Experiment 910 at the AGS: "Searching for a strange particle in an
                             even stranger land."
========================================================================


_______________________________________________
tulip mailing list
tulip@scyld.com
http://www.scyld.com/mailman/listinfo/tulip