[tulip] Re: de4x5 and tulip
Homer Wilson Smith
homer@lightlink.com
Sun, 4 Jun 2000 12:56:31 -0400 (EDT)
Hi, thanks for answering.
I have completely given up on the 21143 chips and FD with
the cisco 1900 10baseT ports. 100baseT works fine.
I went and bought 60 21140's to keep me going until the world
ends!
Homer
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clear Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth and Peace. Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
On Sat, 3 Jun 2000, David C. Davies wrote:
> Homer,
>
> I'll check into this. FDX seems to be a problem that's coming up more
> often... As you found out, you will need the updated driver in 2.2.x to
> recognise the 21143 chipset.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dave
> -------------------------
>
> Homer Wilson Smith wrote:
>
> Dear Sir,
>
> I have despaired of getting the Kingston KNE100TX 21143
> ethercard
> to run in Full Duplex at 10baseT with a Cisco 1900. It just
> won't
> do it using the latest tulip drivers v92 from Donald Becker.
>
> Kingston suggested I use the de4x5.c driver, it wouldn't
> find the card
> at all in 2.0.36, but loads fine in 2.2.13. However it too
> will not do
> Full Duplex using insmod de4x5 args='eth0:fdx'. The Cisco1900
> switch is in
> forced full dup mode, and it shows *TERRIBLE* packet
> throughput and lots
> of runt frames, classic signs that the card is still using
> half while the
> Cisco is in fact in full.
>
> Is there anything I can do to get the 21143 Kingston to
> work
> properly with the Cisco 1900 switch?
>
> Homer
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Homer Wilson Smith Clear Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix -
> Lightlink
> (607) 277-0959 A Green Earth and Peace. Internet
> Access, Ithaca NY
> homer@lightlink.com Is that too much to ask?
> http://www.lightlink.com
>
> --
> --------------------------------
>
> The Rich Tapestry of Life is Fraying . . .
>
>