tulip V.90f
Peter Green
pcg@gospelcom.net
Tue Dec 22 18:26:06 1998
On Tue, 22 Dec 1998, Peter Green wrote:
> file = ungzipped 2.1.127 linux kernel (still tarred)
>
> 10.0.0.1 = SMC Etherpower II
> 10.0.0.51 = SMC Etherpower II
> 204.253.132.4 = SMC Etherpower II
> 204.253.132.10 = Netgear FA310TX w/ Lite-On
I failed to mention that 10.1 and 204.253.132.4 are physically located in
the same machine, as are 10.51 and 204.253.132.10. So other things (CPU,
&c.) shouldn't be a deciding factor. Furthermore, here's some more machine
info:
> 10.0.0.1 = SMC Etherpower II
> 204.253.132.4 = SMC Etherpower II
PPro 200 (or possibly low P2), 384M RAM, stock 2.0.34 kernel w/ RH Linux
5.1, epic100.c v. 0.99B 4/7/98.
> 10.0.0.51 = SMC Etherpower II
> 204.253.132.10 = Netgear FA310TX w/ Lite-On
AMD 233, 128M RAM, 2.1.127 kernel w/ RH Linux 5.1, epic100.c v. 1.04
8/23/98, tulip.c v. 0.90f 12/17/98
/pg
--
Peter Green
Gospel Communications Network, SysAdmin
pcg@gospelcom.net