tulip vs. Lite On
Douglas Eadline
deadline@plogic.com
Tue Dec 8 06:39:36 1998
There was some discussion on the linux smp list about
the genuine tulip vs. the lite on (now used in netgear) chips.
I mentioned that the performance as determined by netperf, was about 75%
for the lite on chips set. I thought the tulip list would
be interested in these numbers.
Tulip driver is .90
Netperf test:
=============
./netperf -t UDP_STREAM -p 12865 -n 2 -l 60 -H remoteX -- -s 65535 -m 1472
./netperf -t TCP_STREAM -p 12865 -n 2 -l 60 -H remoteX
where remoteX is the name of the remote system
tulip to tulip:
================
UDP UNIDIRECTIONAL SEND TEST to remote8
Socket Message Elapsed Messages
Size Size Time Okay Errors Throughput
bytes bytes secs # # 10^6bits/sec
65535 1472 59.99 487416 0 95.68
65535 59.99 487416 95.68
TCP STREAM TEST to remote8
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
65535 65535 65535 60.00 94.75
lite-on to lite-on:
===================
UDP UNIDIRECTIONAL SEND TEST to remote2
Socket Message Elapsed Messages
Size Size Time Okay Errors Throughput
bytes bytes secs # # 10^6bits/sec
65535 1472 60.00 363918 0 71.43
65535 60.00 363918 71.43
TCP STREAM TEST to remote2
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
65535 65535 65535 60.00 71.04
This is why we are using 21143 (tulip) NICs and as soon
as Don relaeses .91, we will have the autonegotiation problem
fixed. (HINT HINT)
Doug
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Paralogic, Inc. | PEAK | Voice:+610.861.6960
115 Research Drive | PARALLEL | Fax:+610.861.8247
Bethlehem, PA 18017 USA | PERFORMANCE | http://www.plogic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------