Duplex mode
    Dirk Raebiger 
    drabiger@zpr.uni-koeln.de
    Tue Nov  2 09:48:08 1999
    
    
  
Hi there!
Am Tue, 02 Nov 1999 schrieb Donald Becker:
>On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Dirk Raebiger wrote:
>
>> I'm using v1.08a of rtl8139 together with linux kernel 2.2.13. The network
>> administrator at the institute here says that my machine (gollum) sends in
>> full-duplex mode. This is also what the led of the card says (full duplex).
>
>Incorrect duplex is not a typical problem for a rtl8139.
May be right, I am no wizard on that topic. Can you tell me a apropriate
place for this?
>>>  The chip configuration is 0x10 0x2c, MII half-duplex mode.
>Then the chip is in half duplex mode.
But the card's led says, "full duplex"!
>Please report the contents of /proc/net/dev rather than the summarized
>output of 'ifconfig'.
Inter-|   Receive                                                |  Transmit
 face |bytes    packets errs drop fifo frame compressed multicast|bytes    packets errs drop fifo colls carrier compressed
    lo:   24492     423    0    0    0     0          0         0    24492     423    0    0    0     0       0          0
  eth0:248148029  483518    1    0    0     0          0         0 176119795  437044    0    0    0 103195       0          0
b
>I would hardly call this reporting errors -- a single Rx error could be from
>many sources.
What can I do?
>You are getting collisions which is a certain indication that you are *not*
>in full duplex mode.
Where can I read about collisions and their sources?
What do you think is it then?
>There is no indication that the card is in full duplex mode.
>None at all.
What about the card's led?
Dirk
-- 
Homepage at http://www.raebiger.net/
PGP5.0i key at http://www.zpr.Uni-Koeln.DE/~drabiger/pgp.html
Vote against SPAM! http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
 | To unsubscribe, send mail to Majordomo@cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov, and within the
 |  body of the mail, include only the text:
 |   unsubscribe this-list-name youraddress@wherever.org
 | You will be unsubscribed as speedily as possible.