[Beowulf] Poll - Directory implementation

Ryan Novosielski novosirj at rutgers.edu
Wed Oct 24 10:30:51 PDT 2018

Hash: SHA1

On 10/24/2018 01:13 PM, Michael Di Domenico wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 1:04 PM Ryan Novosielski
> <novosirj at rutgers.edu> wrote:
>> Funny, we are considering the exact opposite, and this is our
>> motivation:
>> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2440481
> we're contemplating the same, but we're okay with switching back
> to the openldap source.  in my opinion redhat deprecating openldap
> is just a money grab to push people towards rhds

I don't have an alternate theory, but 389-ds is free, and I guess I
imagined "comparable." I suppose if it's not as capable as OpenLDAP
and RHDS is, that would make sense. But maybe they just want to push
people toward something where there's an easy path?

People saying that 389-ds is slow is not encouraging, given that we're
currently attempting to tune OpenLDAP to be less slow.

- -- 
 || \\UTGERS,     |----------------------*O*------------------------
 ||_// the State  |    Ryan Novosielski - novosirj at rutgers.edu
 || \\ University | Sr. Technologist - 973/972.0922 ~*~ RBHS Campus
 ||  \\    of NJ  | Office of Advanced Res. Comp. - MSB C630, Newark


More information about the Beowulf mailing list