[Beowulf] Register article on Epyc (Brian Dobbins)

John Hearns hearnsj at googlemail.com
Thu Jun 22 14:04:08 PDT 2017

David, you recall correctly. I recall working with Clustervision. We
installed the first 64 bit x86 cluster in the UK,
at the chemistry department in Manchester University.  AMD CPUs, 1U pizza
For the life of me I Cannot recall the manufacturer... but it was a white
Remember that SuSE hired the guy who ported to the x86-64 architecture. I
remember him giving LUG talks...
(arghhh.. name escapes me too...)

On 22 June 2017 at 21:27, mathog <mathog at caltech.edu> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:04:34 -0600 Brian Dobbins wrote
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Christopher Samuel <
>> samuel at unimelb.edu.au>
>> wrote:
>> I thought it interesting that the only performance info in that article
>>> for Epyc were SpecINT and (the only mention for SpecFP was for Radeon).
>> As did I, but a little digging shows a STREAM benchmark (on AMD's page)
>> showing +25% performance of a single-socket Epyc vs. a dual-socket E5-2690
>> v4 Broadwell system[1], and roughly 60% better specfp_rate2006 numbers
>> when
>> comparing socket-to-socket[2].  When I read stuff like this, I feel a
>> little bit like Charlie Brown going to kick the football, and *hoping*
>> it's
>> not going to get whisked away by Lucy...
> If by Lucy you mean Intel, then that suspicion may have some merit.
> Recall that when the Opterons first came out the major manufacturers did
> not ship any systems with it for what, a year, maybe longer?  I vaguely
> recall SuperMicro going in quickly and Dell, HP, and IBM whistling in a
> corner.  Something about contractual obligations to Intel, or a desire not
> to piss off Intel.
> Let's see, HP shipped its first system "in the first half" of 2004.
> http://www.networkworld.com/article/2330795/data-center/hp-
> to-ship-its-first-opteron-servers.html
> while the first Opterons shipped in, um, April 2003.  So yes, about a year.
> When the multiple core Opterons came out once again the big manufacturers
> were slow to ship them, although in some cases it was apparently due to
> supply issues:
> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/06/ibm_opteron_x3455/
> Regards,
> David Mathog
> mathog at caltech.edu
> Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech
> _______________________________________________
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
> http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.beowulf.org/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20170622/f568075d/attachment.html>

More information about the Beowulf mailing list