[Beowulf] Putting /home on Lusture of GPFS

Novosielski, Ryan novosirj at ca.rutgers.edu
Tue Dec 23 18:14:49 PST 2014

I run an old Lustre (1.8.9), but it doesn't support some forms of file locking that were even required for compiling some software. Doesn't happen often, but enough to give me pause.

____ *Note: UMDNJ is now Rutgers-Biomedical and Health Sciences*
|| \\UTGERS      |---------------------*O*---------------------
||_// Biomedical | Ryan Novosielski - Senior Technologist
|| \\ and Health | novosirj at rutgers.edu<mailto:novosirj at rutgers.edu>- 973/972.0922 (2x0922)
||  \\  Sciences | OIRT/High Perf & Res Comp - MSB C630, Newark

On Dec 23, 2014, at 12:11, Prentice Bisbal <prentice.bisbal at rutgers.edu<mailto:prentice.bisbal at rutgers.edu>> wrote:


I have limited experience managing parallel filesytems like GPFS or
Lustre. I was discussing putting /home and /usr/local for my cluster on
a GPFS or Lustre filesystem, in addition to using it just for /scratch.
I've never done this before, but it doesn't seem like all that bad an
idea. My logic for this is the following:

1. Users often try to run programs from in /home, which leads to errors,
no matter how many times I tell them not to do that. This would make the
system more user-friendly. I could use quotas/policies to encourage them
to use 'steer' them to use other filesystems if needed.

2. Having one storage system to manage is much better than 3.

3. Profit?

Anyway, another person in the conversation felt that this would be bad,
because if someone was running a job that would hammer the fileystem, it
would make the filesystem unresponsive, and keep other people from
logging in and doing work. I'm not buying this concern for the following

If a job can hammer your parallel filesystem so that the login nodes
become unresponsive, you've got bigger problems, because that means
other jobs can't run on the cluster, and the job hitting the filesystem
hard has probably slowed down to a crawl, too.

I know there are some concerns  with the stability of parallel
filesystems, so if someone wants to comment on the dangers of that, too,
I'm all ears. I think that the relative instability of parallel
filesystems compared to NFS would be the biggest concern, not performance.

Prentice Bisbal
Manager of Information Technology
Rutgers Discovery Informatics Institute (RDI2)
Rutgers University

Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org<mailto:Beowulf at beowulf.org> sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.beowulf.org/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20141223/2c741e64/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Beowulf mailing list