[Beowulf] Open source and the Draft Report of the Task Force on High Performance Computing
Prentice Bisbal
prentice.bisbal at rutgers.edu
Thu Aug 28 06:54:43 PDT 2014
Disclaimer:
I didn't read the full report. I was only responding to the quote
included in the original e-mail. It sounds like Gavin was responding to
the whole report, based on subsequent posts.
I'll read the whole report and then post my own obligatory rant.
Prentice
On 08/28/2014 09:50 AM, Prentice Bisbal wrote:
> Gavin,
>
> You didn't read the full sentence. The keyword is 'commercial' (I
> added the emphasis):
>
>> There has been very little open source that has made its way into
>> broad use
>> within the HPC COMMERCIAL community where great emphasis is placed on
>> serviceability and security
>
> This shouldn't be news to most of us. In the commercial world, it
> seems a lot of managers want to pay for commercial software so they
> can call/blame/sue someone when something goes wrong with the
> software. This is why Red Hat Enterprise Linux exists.
>
> Prentice Bisbal
> Manager of Information Technology
> Rutgers Discovery Informatics Institute (RDI2)
> Rutgers University
> http://rdi2.rutgers.edu
>
> On 08/28/2014 08:26 AM, Gavin W. Burris wrote:
>> Hi, Bill.
>>
>> This is perplexing...
>>
>> So, the Linux kernel and supporting tools that make the operating
>> system aren't
>> being factored in here? The compiler? The libraries? If "very
>> little open
>> source" has "made its way into broad use within HPC," what OS are the
>> majority
>> running if not Linux? This seem to be greatly uninformed, or pushing an
>> agenda. The only way I can see this excerpt as even remotely true
>> would be if
>> you applied a very narrow survey to a specific application set. But that
>> narrow view does not apply to a full operational stack or all of HPC in
>> general! I'm baffled, because this does not jive with my lay of the
>> land.
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
>> On 07:29PM Wed 08/27/14 -0700, Bill Broadley wrote:
>>> The URL:
>>> http://energy.gov/seab/downloads/draft-report-task-force-high-performance-computing
>>>
>>>
>>> One piece I found particularly interesting:
>>>
>>> There has been very little open source that has made its way into
>>> broad use
>>> within the HPC commercial community where great emphasis is
>>> placed on
>>> serviceability and security. There is a better track record in
>>> data analytics
>>> recently with map/reduce as a notable example. This is less of an
>>> issue for
>>> universities or national laboratories but they represent no more
>>> than about
>>> 10%-15% of all HPC usage. Of course, one cannot “force” the
>>> adoption of open
>>> source but one should also not plan on it being a panacea to any
>>> ecosystem
>>> shortcoming. A focus investment effort within universities could
>>> expand the
>>> volume of open source and increase the chances that some of the
>>> software
>>> output could become commercialized. It should be noted that the most
>>> significant consumption of open source software is China and it
>>> is also the
>>> case that the Chinese are rare contributors to open source as well.
>>> Investments in open source or other policy actions to stimulate
>>> creation are
>>> likely to produce a disproportionate benefit accruing to the
>>> Chinese.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin
>>> Computing
>>> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
>>> http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
>
More information about the Beowulf
mailing list