[Beowulf] Racing kernels
Stuart Midgley
stuart.midgley at anu.edu.au
Mon Apr 4 18:46:36 PDT 2005
Yes. We run a static kernel on our cluster with only the necessary
stuff for our hardware configure in (along with a few in-house kernel
hacks). We also run a very very very cut down version of RH8.0 (lots
of rpm -e --nodeps --force stuff) which fits in around 600MB. It can
be a pain to get working :) You go through the
1) build kernel
2) install kernel
3) reboot
4) "bugger, forgot something"
5) goto 1)
a lot :)
Stu.
On 04/04/2005, at 18:04, Fringe Dweller wrote:
> G'day all.
>
> Is anyone out there running a "racing" kernel on their nodes?
>
> By "racing" I mean removing all unnecessary components (SCSI, USB et
> al), tweaked buffer values, pre-empting, stripped, helium filled,
> brushed aluminum etc?
>
> Yes, it's a loaded question. I'm contemplating performance tweaking
> when I realized that there's a bucket load of stuff in the default
> kernel config I don't need.
>
> Now anyone that's ever been exposed to that strange subspecies known
> as "overclockers" knows you can go to ridiculous lengths ("Duuude,
> it's fully sick, I can get another 2.3MHz if I take the box outside
> and hit it with a hose").
>
> I'd like to think we're giving priority to stability. But still... I
> think there's scope for "safe" improvement?
>
> Also need to include the type of target app(s) I s'pose. My Nbody apps
> are smokin' math stuff but the IO is quite light. So there'd be a fair
> range of variation in "optimal" config I'd imagine.
>
> Thoughts appreciated.
>
> Cheers
> Steve
--
<--------------------------------------------------------------------->
Dr Stuart Midgley | stuart.midgley at anu.edu.au
Supercomputer Facility | smidgley at netspace.net.au
Leonard Huxley Building 56 | +61 (0)2 6125 5988 Work
Australian National University | +61 (0)2 6125 8199 Fax
CANBERRA ACT 0200 | +61 (0)4 1125 2488 Mob
More information about the Beowulf
mailing list