serial console system comparison
Nicholas Henke
henken at seas.upenn.edu
Thu Mar 27 12:22:35 PST 2003
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:54:14 -0600
Gary Stiehr <gary at umsl.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
> We have used the RAS2000 and have had no problems with it. I
> can
> access the consoles of each of the connected systems. It was much more
>
> work to set up RedHat Linux to use a serial console than it was to set
>
> up the RAS2000. If you do go with RAS2000, don't forget to read the
> "Tipmenu Release Notes" which will be one of the most helpful of the
> documents. I have not had the opportunity to work with any other
> serial console systems, however, so I don't know how they compare. I
> hope this helps.
>
We have both the Cyclades and the Equinox -- as long as both are setup
to use reverse tcp and the conserver package ( in xcat, as well as
standalone ), either works extremely well. We have not had experience
with the cyclades tech support, ( yet ... ), but they have large shoes
to fill to meet Equinox.
Nic
--
Nicholas Henke
Penguin Herder & Linux Cluster System Programmer
Liniac Project - Univ. of Pennsylvania
More information about the Beowulf
mailing list