synchronizing sound cards in a cluster

Josip Loncaric josip at nianet.org
Fri Mar 14 07:02:16 PST 2003


Robert G. Brown wrote:
> 
> a) Check out the documentation on http://www.ntp.org/documentation.html.
> From what it says, you can synchronize at roughly the level of network
> latency with ntp alone, so you can (I would expect) get an otherwise
> quiet LAN sync'd to a millisecond or even less.  NTP does correction
> over a long time and damps to a common clock, so you MIGHT get down
> below the 1 ms mark over time.  I doubt that ntp alone would make 10
> usec.

NTP is great; I've been using it for 15 years.  Back then, our HP-UX machines 
could reliably synchronize local clocks to sub-msec levels using NTP.

Our Linux cluster clocks are synchronized to our NTP broadcast head node 
within about 1-5 msec (estimated based on clockdiff and ntpq data).  If you 
need higher precision, NTP polling can do even better.  Although network 
latency within a cluster can be almost 100 usec, this is repeatable and over 
long time 10 usec synchronization with the local NTP polling server is feasible.

While NTP can adjust local clocks very accurately, Linux system calls which 
read the clock are another source of timing errors.  Although gettimeofday() 
returns microseconds, this is not always reliable down to the last digit.  On 
the average, you can probably expect 10 usec or better results.  For example, 
on our machines, ntpq reports local clock jitter of 8 usec.

Sincerely,
Josip


-- 
Dr. Josip Loncaric, Research Fellow              mailto:josip at nianet.org
National Institute of Aerospace       http://research.nianet.org/~josip/
144 Research Drive                       mailto:j.loncaric at larc.nasa.gov
Hampton, VA 23666, USA         Tel. +1-757-766-1395  Fax +1-757-766-1401




More information about the Beowulf mailing list