gig ether cards
Robert Latham
robl at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Nov 26 09:24:55 PST 2002
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:36:14AM -0500, Mike Davis wrote:
> The problem was made worse by the installation of pvfs. Even with the
> most recent version, we could not get dependable performance. We then
> broke channel bonding but seemed to be experiencing pvfs errors at this
> point caused by a lack of bandwith.
Hi mike
let's talk about your pvfs problems on the pvfs-users mailing list
(pvfs-users at beowulf-underground.org). The short story is that we have
never seen a lack of bandwidth cause pvfs errors, but we can help you
figure out what's causing the errors.
> That brings me to the question above. I'm going to renetwork my 64p
> cluster for GigEther. Any advice on cards would be greatly appreciated.
the data's a bit old now, but might be a good starting point for you:
http://www.cs.uni.edu/~gray/gig-over-copper/gig-over-copper.html
==rob
--
Rob Latham
Mathematics and Computer Science Division A215 0178 EA2D B059 8CDF
Argonne National Labs, IL USA B29D F333 664A 4280 315B
More information about the Beowulf
mailing list