opinion on XFS
lindahl at keyresearch.com
Fri May 10 00:26:21 PDT 2002
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 08:49:01PM -0500, Roger L. Smith wrote:
> This is a bit of a circular argument. "XFS doesn't solve problems, it
> just runs better on hardware that ext2 didn't work correctly on."
I didn't say the first half of the quote. It's more fair to say that I
don't think that ext2 is broken in general. I only have suspicions why
XFS worked for you when you think ext2 did not.
> Just so I don't sound like a complete XFS zealot (which I'm not), I do
> have to say that I've been quite satisfied with the performance of ext3.
ext3 should have all of the correctness problems you think you saw
More information about the Beowulf