Because XFS is BETTER (Re: opinion on XFS)
erayo at cs.bilkent.edu.tr
Thu May 9 13:02:31 PDT 2002
On Thursday 09 May 2002 19:54, Chris Black wrote:
> I am generally very happy with reiserfs (especially under 2.4), in
> particular its handling of directories with thousands of results files
> from cluster jobs.
That's really an advantage. Space utilization is in fact quite important
for contemporary applications on UNIX. Especially since we tend to have
so many small files such as sources, etc. nowadays. The savings can be
If reiserfs has matured, it would be great for clusters. Things are changing
too fast, and I suppose I will have to retract that statement of mine. :)The
most important feature in a beowulf cluster would be no-fs-death-on-crash.
It's very easy to crash a node with a suitable code, so I shouldn't have to
re-install it or manually fsck it every time it fails to reboot after such a
So maybe in the meantime JFS has matured, too?
Thanks for your comments,
Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo at cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo Malfunction: http://mp3.com/ariza
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C
More information about the Beowulf