Motherboard query...
Michael Prinkey
mikeprinkey at hotmail.com
Fri Mar 1 08:40:35 PST 2002
Robert,
I will add my own two cents. I have built several software RAID servers
with different motherboards and Promise Ultra66/100 controllers. My best
performing servers to date used 80-GB Maxtor 5400-RPM drives, two Ultra100
controllers, and the Intel i850 motherboard. I used two drives per channel
on the Promise cards (I know...that is supposed to be bad) and two drives on
the on-board secondary controller. Ten 80-GB drives are configured as 8
data + 1 parity + 1 hot spare.
Bonnie numbers are below. Write 28.5 MB/s, read 56.1 MB/s.
I think that performance would be better if the raid drives only touched the
Promise controllers. Also, I haven't seen any performance advantage to
using one drive per EIDE channel. For smaller 4-drive arrays, the results
are essentially identical.
Mike Prinkey
Aeolus Research, Inc.
-----
Bonnie 1.2: File '/raid//Bonnie.1423', size: 1048576000, volumes: 10
Writing with putc()... done: 17551 kB/s 96.7 %CPU
Rewriting... done: 20181 kB/s 13.3 %CPU
Writing intelligently... done: 28519 kB/s 16.8 %CPU
Reading with getc()... done: 18204 kB/s 92.7 %CPU
Reading intelligently... done: 56106 kB/s 9.9 %CPU
Seek numbers calculated on first volume only
Seeker 1...Seeker 2...Seeker 3...start 'em...done...done...done...
---Sequential Output (nosync)--- ---Sequential Input-- --Rnd
Seek-
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --04k
(03)-
Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec
%CPU
raid04 10*1000 17551 96.7 28519 16.8 20181 13.3 18204 92.7 56106 9.9 101.6
0.8
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
More information about the Beowulf
mailing list