Boards for Fastest Intel Processors
Craig Tierney
ctierney at hpti.com
Fri Jan 11 10:34:58 PST 2002
Not sure on the availability. Even if I did know, it would
be NDA. The serverworks chipset, Grand Champion HE, looks very
promising. PCI-X, uses DDR-RAM, had 6.4 GB/s memory bandwidth.
The i860 chipset has 3.2 GB/s. Each P4 and Xeon is said to
drive 3.2 GB/s. If Supermicro puts the HE chipset on the dual
board which I think is going to happen I am going to drool.
The current Xeon at 1.7 Ghz puts up a great fight with Alpha
833 Mhz chips when you use the right compiler. Performance of
the Xeon is only about 20% slower but at 1/4 the cost. Increased
cache and the increase in the memory bandwidth for the P4 in a dual setup
will be better for my codes than Alpha. Your codes may vary.
Craig
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 10:46:00AM -0600, Steven Timm wrote:
> Does anyone have any recommendations on what type of dual Xeon
> motherboard to get to be able to run these new 2.2 GHz processors?
> I have heard a lot about the Supermicro boards but am suspect due
> to problems with several earlier versions of Supermicro PIII boards.
>
> Is there any word on when Intel will be releasing their new
> board with the native Intel chipset instead of a Serverworks chipset?
>
> Steve
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Steven C. Timm (630) 840-8525 timm at fnal.gov http://home.fnal.gov/~timm/
> Fermilab Computing Division/Operating Systems Support
> Scientific Computing Support Group--Computing Farms Operations
>
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Craig Tierney wrote:
>
> > The 2.2 Ghz cpus have just been released. This generation
> > of cpu is built at 0.13 microns and has twice as big of a
> > L2 cache (512 KB). These are the single processor versions.
> > The Xeon (smp) chips should follow shortly (I am guessing).
> > Go look at the roadmaps at www.theregister.co.uk. They tend to
> > be accurate.
> >
> > I have not heard that there is a problem with the 2.0 Ghz. Is
> > it a problem with RedHat or the Linux kernel specifically? We
> > had no problems with the 1.7 Ghz Xeon chips, but they are not the
> > 2.0 Ghz that you are talking about.
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 07:03:35AM -0800, Rob Simac wrote:
> > > What is the fastest Intel processors available to the public? Have
> > > the 2.0 Ghz been released? I have also heard rumors that the 2.0 Ghz
> > > has problems running with Red Hat 7.1. Has anyone else heard this?
> > >
> > > Ciao,
> > > Rob.
> > >
> > > ======================================================
> > > Rob Simac -- Therma-Wave, Inc. -- rsimac at thermawave.com
> > > <mailto:rsimac at thermawave.com>
> > > ======================================================
> > > "Remember this, foolish mortals, when ye stare headlong into the
> > > mind-paralyzing void, the inky black nothingness of existence, the
> > > hellish yawning maw of the abyss -- it's pretty damn dark, so give it a
> > > few minutes for your eyes to adjust."
> > > Frank M. Carrano, Branford, Conn.
> > > (Bulwer-Lytton Writing Contest Runner-up)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Craig Tierney (ctierney at hpti.com)
> > _______________________________________________
> > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
> > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
--
Craig Tierney (ctierney at hpti.com)
More information about the Beowulf
mailing list