Advice on "mini" Beowulf cluster
Patrick Geoffray
patrick at myri.com
Fri Feb 1 11:17:40 PST 2002
Hi Miska,
Miska Le Louarn wrote:
> Eventually this will be the limiting part in the simulation. We want to
> process the biggest matrix we can afford to. We will use Scalapack (or
> something similar).
> I suspect this might be network intensive, since chuncks of the matrix
> need to be passed to other nodes during the calculation.
> Typically the matrix size will be 10 000 elements (doubles) squared and
> larger.
Matrices multiply of 10000 can easily fit on one machine. Have you
looked at 4-way SMPs ?
Scalapack is "dense", you will be fine with Fast ethernet, specially
for a small number of nodes. Don't use a tiny blocksize and you won't
produce much traffic (rule of thumb: use the optimal blocksize
computed by ATLAS and try 1x, 2x, 3x, ...).
If you use a "sparse" package, this is a little different but if
cost is an important parameter, Fast Ethernet is your best choice.
> I chose Gigabit to be on the safe side. But is that overkill ?
Yes. For this context, Fast Ethernet is enough. You can still upgrade
later if you need, but I think you won't. And Fast Ethernet is free
these days.
Patrick
----------------------------------------------------------
| Patrick Geoffray, Ph.D. patrick at myri.com
| Myricom, Inc. http://www.myri.com
| Cell: 865-389-8852 685 Emory Valley Rd (B)
| Phone: 865-425-0978 Oak Ridge, TN 37830
----------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Beowulf
mailing list