Channel-bonding - choice of switch?
Jakob Østergaard
jakob at unthought.net
Thu Jul 12 06:37:36 PDT 2001
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 02:02:45PM -0500, Mike Weller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently trying to channel-bond our 5-node test cluster (running
> Scyld). Since we already had an HP 4000m ProCurve switch,
> (http://www.hp.com/rnd/products/switches/switch4000/specs.htm ),
> I decided to use that. It does support trunking and Fast
> EtherChannel.
You can buy separate switches, unmanaged dirt cheap ones.
Trunking N nics per node, requires N switches.
This works, is simple, and it's cheap.
--
................................................................
: jakob at unthought.net : And I see the elder races, :
:.........................: putrid forms of man :
: Jakob Østergaard : See him rise and claim the earth, :
: OZ9ABN : his downfall is at hand. :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:
More information about the Beowulf
mailing list