What do you guys thing about the P4
W Bauske
wsb at paralleldata.com
Wed Apr 4 21:07:14 PDT 2001
Mark Hahn wrote:
>
>
> cint2000
> compaq es40 6/866 544
> athlon 1.33, amd760 pc2100 539
> intel P4/1.5 i850 2xPC800 536
> athlon 1.30 kt133 pc133 491
> intel PIII/1.0, i840 2xpc800 462
>
> cfp2000
> compaq es40 6/866 658
> intel P4/1.5 i850 2xpc800 558
> athlon 1.33, amd760 pc2100 445
> athlon 1.30 kt133 pc133 374
> intel PIII/1.0, i840 2xpc800 335
>
> it's a shame they don't have kt133a results, since "enthusiast" sites
> report that keeping the FSB synchronous with the dram bus results in a
> nontrivial performance improvement. I'm guessing it would score
> pretty impressively, around 410/540.
>
For now, with Athlon at 1.33Ghz/DDR, SPECint is a wash and
P4 is 25-49% faster than Athlon on SPECfp depending on Athlon
memory system. It all comes down to testing your own app on each
system to see which one makes sense for your code's behavior
along with your compiler.
Wes
More information about the Beowulf
mailing list