[tulip] Re: Kingston
Christopher E. Brown
Mon, 22 May 2000 15:40:24 -0900 (HADT)
On Mon, 22 May 2000, Homer Wilson Smith wrote:
> > What Kingston card? I have had zero problems with the
> > KNE100TX units. The later ones (21143 based) require a .91 driver,
> > but thats it. I have > 100 used (20 somthing are 21143), and about 15
> > of the 21143 units are talking to cisco switches.
> I am using KNE100TX with 21143 connected to cisco 1900,
> 10baseT forced full dup. The card won't auto negotiate, but
> can be 'forced' into various Fd modes through the options=command.
> Most of the FD modes don't work at all, some do work, but statistics
> on the Ciscos show lots of runt frames and very slow throughput, the usual
> signs of the card being in half duplex and the Cisco being in full.
> This behavior is replicateable with the 21140 by actually
> putting them in half duplex while the cisco is in full dup.
> The 21140's work properly providing 1000Kbyte/sec throughput
> between two linux boxes in FD mode options=16.
> The Full dup green light never turns on in either card,
> but we are very happy with the performance of the 21140's.
> Alsa they are no longer avialable.
> If I am doing something stupid here, I would dearly love
> to know because we are very dedicated to the Kingston 2114x's
Am very confused here, I have been using the KNE100TX units, 1
- 4 per box for some time. When the 21143 units started arriveing it
was fun, but as soon as I switched from 89h everything was happy
again. I checked, the 15 21143 KNE100TX cards are talking to Catalyst
2900 series units. All drop straight into 100FD, and more than a few
hold 80Mbit+ each way during office hrs (Linux based filtering
firewalls, and MASQ boxes).
As folks might have suspected, not much survives except roaches,
and they don't carry large enough packets fast enough...
--About the Internet and nuclear war.