Databook on Lite-On PNIC-II

[Christopher Smith]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 10:11:00PM -0500, Donald Becker wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Christopher Smith wrote:
> > I knew the chip was supposed to be compatible with Macronix's
> > products. So, I e-mailed Macronix and asked them for info on which
> > of their chips was the same as Lite-On chip. They have told me that
> > the 98715 is an exact match.
> While Macronix and Lite-On have a close relationship, the PNIC-II is *not*
> the same as the 98715.  Beyond both being loosely Tulip clones, they are not
> even close.  A quick look at the driver sections will confirm this.
> 
> The PNIC-II datasheet is (or was at one time), proprietary.  I have no
> rights to redistribute it.

Sigh. I guess I didn't get a response from the cluefull. :-( What is
the point of having a proprietary datasheet for a product meant to be
compatible with another chip? ;-)

- --Chris


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>

iD8DBQE44Fx+frrCpthD+UYRAuHVAJ48u4HsjL2RTF4+cSJQQiEyusLMwACeIKKF
qv/Ub/m3u16apyb7RPP7aNs=
=MseP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send a message body containing "unsubscribe"
to linux-tulip-request@beowulf.org