<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.oracle.com/news/announcement/blog/keep-linux-open-and-free-2023-07-10/">https://www.oracle.com/news/announcement/blog/keep-linux-open-and-free-2023-07-10/</a></p>
    <p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.suse.com/news/SUSE-Preserves-Choice-in-Enterprise-Linux/">https://www.suse.com/news/SUSE-Preserves-Choice-in-Enterprise-Linux/</a><br>
    </p>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Prentice</pre>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/28/23 5:20 PM, Jonathan Engwall
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP=T6ZNA92ak46yFQnsniO3NTMkPadaPHK-OgVN933b1-2Vo_Q@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="auto">
        <div><br>
          <br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jun 27, 2023, 6:59
              AM Gerald Henriksen <<a
                href="mailto:ghenriks@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">ghenriks@gmail.com</a>>
              wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Mon,
              26 Jun 2023 14:27:23 -0400, you wrote:<br>
              <br>
              >By now, most of you should have heard about Red Hat's
              latest to <br>
              >eliminate any competition to RHEL. If not, here's some
              links:<br>
              <br>
              I think it is safer to say IBM's efforts.<br>
              <br>
              >3. After RH starting contributing funding to GNOME
              development, the next <br>
              >major version of RHEL didn't install other desktops
              during the install. <br>
              >I remember RHEL saying this was a bug, but I've always
              suspected it was <br>
              >a deliberate act to reduce KDE market share and and
              give RH another area <br>
              >of the Linux ecosystem it could control.<br>
              <br>
              I think that is unlikely given how unsuitable (at least in
              the Linux<br>
              world) long term stable distributions like RHEL are to the
              desktop<br>
              environment.<br>
              <br>
              I always attributed that stuff to internal politics with
              the internal<br>
              Gnome team doing things to preserve their existence,
              particular when<br>
              they went different with Gnome 3.<br>
              <br>
              >4. RH takes over control of CentOS, which at the time
              was the only <br>
              >competitor to RHEL.<br>
              <br>
              It was more a case of Red Hat rescuing CentOS.<br>
              <br>
              At the time the CentOS project was in trouble as they
              struggled and<br>
              failed to bring out their versions in anything like a
              timely manner<br>
              after the RHEL release.  I suspect the IBM version of Red
              Hat would<br>
              have just let CentOS fail.<br>
              <br>
              >Not long after, RHEL eliminates CentOS as a competitor
              by <br>
              >changing it to "CentOS  Stream" so it's no longer a
              competitor to RHEL. <br>
              <br>
              No.<br>
              <br>
              CentOS as part of Red Hat lasted almost 7 years (taken
              over by Red Hat<br>
              in January 2014, killed in December 2020)<br>
              <br>
              Guesswork, but if IBM doesn't buy Red Hat it's possible
              CentOS still<br>
              exists.<br>
              <br>
              >CentOS Stream is now a development version of sorts
              for RHEL, but I <br>
              >thought that was exactly what Fedora was for.<br>
              <br>
              Recent discussion on Fedora mailing list has it as major
              version of<br>
              RHEL split off from Fedora but CentOS Stream is used for
              minor<br>
              versions.<br>
              <br>
              How long this remains to be true is debatable.<br>
              <br>
              Red Hat/IBM recently eliminated a paid position dealing
              with Fedora,<br>
              they have killed off LibreOffice in RHEL (by not replacing
              an<br>
              employee) and thus its future in Fedora is dependent on
              new<br>
              maintainers stepping up.  </blockquote>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div dir="auto"><br>
        </div>
        <div dir="auto">Rhetorical question, of course you have; have
          you ever simply uninstalled a package as large as LibreOffice?
          Extremely bad things happen. But no engineer responsible for
          the Red Hat image would be so foolish. The fly on the wall may
          have stories to tell.</div>
        <div dir="auto"><br>
        </div>
        <div dir="auto">
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Red
              Hat/IBM has also been looking at<br>
              stretching the Fedora rules for their OpenJDK support in
              Fedora with a<br>
              unsaid threat of we could stop providing OpenJDK packages
              in Fedora.<br>
              <br>
              Also Fedora went to BTRFS as a default file system even
              though Red Hat<br>
              stopped supporting it.<br>
              <br>
              >With RH (and IBM?) so focused on market
              dominance/profits, it's not a <br>
              >stretch to think they they'll eventually "say no" to
              supporting anything <br>
              >other than x86 and POWER processors, since the other
              processors don't <br>
              >have enough market share to make it profitable, or
              compete with IBM's <br>
              >offerings.<br>
              <br>
              ARM has a reasonable presence in the cloud providers and
              probably has<br>
              a bigger market share than POWER at this point.<br>
              <br>
              _______________________________________________<br>
              Beowulf mailing list, <a
                href="mailto:Beowulf@beowulf.org" target="_blank"
                rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">Beowulf@beowulf.org</a>
              sponsored by Penguin Computing<br>
              To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe)
              visit <a
                href="https://beowulf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beowulf"
                rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://beowulf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beowulf</a><br>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Beowulf@beowulf.org">Beowulf@beowulf.org</a> sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://beowulf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beowulf">https://beowulf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beowulf</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>