<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2448.0">
<TITLE></TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I posted this recently, and much to my surprise and embarrasment, it's RTF format. Sorry folks. Here it is again.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>========================================</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Dr. Ligon presents great points. . . </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Great discussion, and I'd like to interject a little $.02 from the health care industry. </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>The attractiveness of beowulf technology lies in its definition: beowulf refers to a 'class' </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>of machines, and general topology, which I believe is what the folks at NASA intended. </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>That's important, because it lets me adopt the approach to what works best for my environment. </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Case in point, PVM, MPICH, JPVM or even Serialization of Java classes would, as I understand </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>it be appropriately used in a beowulf cluster. That flexibility allows </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>me to run proof of concepts on the hardware I have available. </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>The general definition of beowulf-class machines also lets me focus on the functionality of </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>my application more than the particular toolset used. Speed of prototyping is crucial to my research </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>efforts where clustering in and of itself is not my core objective. So, a general purpose </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>definition rather than a detailed specification is important - specific benchmarks, although </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>an initial consideration, can be improved later. </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>At the same time having a standard reference to a beowulf-class machine gives me an </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>important frame of reference - and one I'll desperately need once I present my initial results </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>to the boss to ask for more hardware!! </FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Richard Schilling </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Web Integration Programmer </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Affiliated Health Services </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Mount Vernon, WA USA </FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message----- </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Walter B. Ligon III [<A HREF="mailto:walt@parl.ces.clemson.edu">mailto:walt@parl.ces.clemson.edu</A>] </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 10:56 AM </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: David S. Greenberg </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Cc: Ward William E PHDN; 'Beowulf' Mailing List (E-mail) </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: Re: philosophical question - limits of beowulf defn </FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-------- </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>A quick agreement on both Doug's contribution and David's posting. </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>The EL community did grow up as a SUPERSET of Beowulf because there </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>are many cluster based systems that are not, technically, a Beouwlf, </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>but share many interesting problems. I think it is even MORE important </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>to realize that the EL community is ALSO focused on the open-source (Linux) </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>OS issue - which allows us to evolve the OS to better meet the needs of </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>more extreme systems (one of which is a Beowulf). </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I have always been rather particular about the name "Beowulf" for two reasons: </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>first, people did cluster computing long before Beowulf. When Beowulf </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> came out many people said "so what? - it's been done before." </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> but they missed an important point in the COTS HW and open-source </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> OS! The specific characteristis of a Beowulf mean we are *free* </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> to adapt the architecture because the nodes are dedicated, because </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> the OS is open-source, because parallel computing is our goal. I </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> think the next-gen Beowulf software we are working on is going to </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> drive that point home like never before. </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>second, there was an early tendency for people to say "everything is a </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> Beowulf." I'm not against everyone joining the party, by there are </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> many DIFFERENT approaches, including high availability designs, </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> true distributed systems, cycle stealing, etc. and they have </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> different issues. I don't want to dillute the effort going into </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> ANY of these areas byt saying "Hey, its ALL Beowulf, so we're doing </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> Beowulf and we don't need to do any more." That's not where its at. </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> Beowulf is in its infancy, and it is NOT the answer to everyone's </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> problem. I would rather ORGANIZE our efforts so that ALL of those </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> efforts get the recoginition they deserve than let it all wind up </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> a big cloudy mess! </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>So that's why I always butt in on these discussions and why I always take </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>the position that I do. The folks that defined the term had a specific </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>thing in mind, and they have repeatedly indicated they want that definition </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>to stay true (even though some of them are now off doing DIFFERENT things). </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Some day they may come down and tell me to shut up - but until then, I will </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>try to let everyone know where this term came from. I'm not trying to be an </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>ass-hole, I just want to let you know. </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Walt </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-- </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Dr. Walter B. Ligon III </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Associate Professor </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>ECE Department </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Clemson University </FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>_______________________________________________ </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Beowulf mailing list </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Beowulf@beowulf.org </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2><A HREF="http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf" TARGET="_blank">http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf</A> </FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>