[Beowulf] Are disk MTBF ratings at all useful?
landman at scalableinformatics.com
Thu Apr 18 16:40:50 PDT 2013
On 4/18/2013 7:01 PM, mathog wrote:
> High end SATA and SAS disks claim MTBF values that work out to over 100
> years, and yet it is a common
Amazing isn't it. Disks that never fail!
> observation that certain models fail at rates entirely inconsistent
> with those values. For instance,
> 75% of all drives of one model dead in < 6 years. (Cited by one poster
> in this thread:
> ). Additionally, manufacturer warranties at best only go to 5 years,
> which suggests the manufacturers
> don't have a whole lot of faith in their MTBF values.
> Some of you have huge amounts of storage, how many disk models lasted
> as long as their MTBF suggests
> they should? (Personally we have only one set of disks that are still
> consistent with the claimed MTBF,
> a set of 6 Fibre Channel disks that came with a Sun server and are now
> 10 years old - with no failures.)
> How do they come up with the MTBF values for disks anyway? Clearly it
> is not based on watching a large
> sample of disks for countless years!
Statistical analysis (called a bathtub analysis). MTBF's are WAGs at
best, and not well matched against empirical observation.
> David Mathog
> mathog at caltech.edu
> Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
More information about the Beowulf