[Beowulf] A sea of wimpy cores
Bill.Rankin at sas.com
Fri Sep 17 06:11:52 PDT 2010
On Sep 17, 2010, at 7:39 AM, Hearns, John wrote:
Interesting article (more of a letter really) - to be honest when I first scanned it I was not sure of what Holzle's actual argument was. To me, he omitted a lot of the details that makes this discussion much less black-and-white (and much more interesting) than he would contend:
1) He cites Amdahls' law, but leaves out Gustafson's.
2) Yeah, parallel programming is hard. Deal with it. It's helps me pay my bills.
3) While I am not a die hard FLOPS/Watt evangelist, he seems to completely ignore the power and cooling cost when discussing infrastructure costs.
The whole letter just seems like it's full of non-sequiturs and just a general gripe about processor architectures.
I think our own Doug Eadline has been beating the drum (or the alarm
bell) about multicore for some time also.
"may not be preferable to chips with faster but power-hungry cores"
Yeah - bring it on. Specialist computer rooms, flourinert cooling,
unusual word sizes, and the HPC expert kept in a windowless room full of used coffee mugs.
Wow, now *that's* an image. On the other hand I can't help but wonder if you have just shown us the future of GPU-based computing.
Have a good weekend all,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Beowulf