csamuel at vpac.org
Sat May 2 01:21:49 PDT 2009
----- "Gus Correa" <gus at ldeo.columbia.edu> wrote:
> Hi Chris, list
> Thanks for the info!
Not a problem!
> I have been blindly using "-march=amdfam10" (and -O3)
> out of the gcc 4.1.2 man page, simply because it is
> recommended for Barcelona (and hopefully also the
> Shanghais we have).
Well I did a microbenchmark beforehand (actually one from
Joe Landman's blog) and found that the Barcelona extensions
improved performance for it:
but that doesn't seem to carry over into the code our
users are trying with it (possibly because they're not
So I would strongly suggest benchmarking your code both
with and without that option and see what works best for
> What would be the right level of optimization then?
As ever, the answer is "it depends". :-)
Experiment and read the info pages for the optimisation
flags in GCC..
[Intel and Shanghai]
> Is this deliberate?
In the sense that they have no desire to support
competitors hardware, yes. Not really surprising,
if AMD made compilers I doubt they'd try and do
Intel specific optimisations either..
Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager
The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing
P.O. Box 201, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia
VPAC is a not-for-profit Registered Research Agency
More information about the Beowulf