[Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Kilian CAVALOTTI kilian at stanford.eduThu Jun 19 17:25:22 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thursday 19 June 2008 05:08:43 pm Joe Landman wrote: > SElinux and Apparmor try to limit the damage > even in a secure setting, though I am not sure how well they do > there. If you want/need to use things like Lustre, for instance, you can forgot about SELinux and AppArmor, it simply doesn't work. Isn't it a common practice in HPC to keep security rules relatively relaxed *inside* a cluster (passwordless logins between compute nodes for instance), whilst trying to harden the links to the external world? I mean, most of the scientific applications haven't precisely been designed with security as their first concern, have they? Cheers -- Kilian
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
