[Beowulf] NVIDIA GPUs, CUDA, MD5, and "hobbyists"
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Prentice Bisbal prentice at ias.eduWed Jun 18 14:13:30 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] NVIDIA GPUs, CUDA, MD5, and "hobbyists"
- Next message: [Beowulf] NVIDIA GPUs, CUDA, MD5, and "hobbyists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > > Running 128 parallel sessions of md5sum is not so interesting at all, we > all believe this can be done fast. > Vincent, That is the whole point of my original posting. The point was NEVER to demonstrate the use of GPUs for streaming MD5-encrypted data. This was the point of my posting: 1. To prove that CUDA programming is NOT as difficult as you made it out to be. 2. To demonstrate the performance improvement you can get by parallelizing an operation using CUDA. The MD5 algorithm was perfect for this. No claims were ever made as to the need for parallelizing MD5. There is value, however, if your goal is to recover (discover?) an MD5-hashed password through a brute-force attack. Last time I checked, MD5 password s are the default for most Linux distros. 3. To show that more than just "hobbyists" are investigating GPUs. -- Prentice Bisbal Linux Software Support Specialist/System Administrator School of Natural Sciences Institute for Advanced Study Princeton, NJ
- Previous message: [Beowulf] NVIDIA GPUs, CUDA, MD5, and "hobbyists"
- Next message: [Beowulf] NVIDIA GPUs, CUDA, MD5, and "hobbyists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
