[Beowulf] A press release
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Tony Travis ajt at rri.sari.ac.ukWed Jul 2 02:23:06 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] A press release
- Next message: [Beowulf] A press release
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Hahn wrote: >[...] > but I ask again: what are the reasons one might prefer using debian? > really, I'm not criticizing it - I really would like to know why it > would matter whether someone (such as ClusterVisionOS (tm)) would use > debian or another distro. Hello, Mark. I've been on a well trodden path from trying out the 'free' version of Scyld under RH6.2, then using openMosix under all versions of RH up to RH9, Fedora up to core2, then Debian Sarge and now Ubuntu 6.06.1 LTS with an upgrade to 8.04.1 LTS imminent. As I see it, this has been a developmental journey and also a learning experiencefor me. As others on this thread have admitted, I'm not blind to the ideological objectives of Debian. However, I'm now using a very good commerically supported version of Linux with the what is widely acknowledged to be the largest user and developer community. It's my own experience of trying to do my work under RH/Fedora that's put me off these distro's and I see a BIG divide between 'real' HPC communities using BIG iron, and small Beowulf clusters like mine. I've got to admit that Tim Cutts did influence my decision to try out Debian (thanks, Tim!). I also use the (UK) NERC's Bio-Linux binary deb's and I was also influenced by their decision to change from RH to Debian for Bio-Linux. I can see that other communities use RH for similar reasons, though I should mention that our Beowulf spends a lot of time running quantum chemistry simulations (GAMESS etc.). I've pout up an Ubuntu blue-print for 'biobuntu', which consolidates the work I'm doing on several projects: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/biobuntu I am, of course, familiar with 'other' Biolinuxen and rpm repositories of bioinformatics software: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BioLinux Having tried out many of these alternatives, I remain convinced that NEBC's Bio-Linux is most appropriate for my work. In particular, the level of support in the form of documentation and training courses provided by NEBC is very good. This means I don't have to reinvent the wheel - Always a good point for any Beowulf-related activity :-) Tony. -- Dr. A.J.Travis, | mailto:ajt at rri.sari.ac.uk Rowett Research Institute, | http://www.rri.sari.ac.uk/~ajt Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, | phone:+44 (0)1224 712751 Aberdeen AB21 9SB, Scotland, UK. | fax:+44 (0)1224 716687
- Previous message: [Beowulf] A press release
- Next message: [Beowulf] A press release
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
