[Beowulf] Teaching Scientific Computation (looking fo the perfect
florent.calvayrac at univ-lemans.fr
Thu Nov 22 01:58:55 PST 2007
Robert G. Brown a écrit :
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, David Mathog wrote:
>> A = B + C <VecX> D
>> triple = A <dot> B <vecX> C
>> For all I know operator definition does exist in C++ now - the
>> language is humongous and I certainly am not familiar with some of
>> the more obscure corners.
> (one or two last ones while I clear mail:-). Actually a really, really
> interesting idea, but one does have a whole new class of typing errors.
> If you go with either tensor products or graded algebra products, you
> have to think carefully about what happens when you multiply e.g. real
> times quaternion, complex times quaternion, etc. Some of these are as
> ambiguous as multiplying a 2D vector by a 4D vector without specifying
> the embedding or that their is one -- is the result a scalar, a vector,
> or a tensor?
> But it still is a really good idea. There is a generalized algebra of
> dyad, triad, inner and outer products, and so on. It would be really
> interesting to define a compiler that could cope. Even symbolic
> manipulation languages tend to have to work at it and maybe have
> complex and quaternions but rarely anything else.
the TAO language used on the APE family of SIMD computers (lot of
does exactly that thanks to a good macro preprocessor. It is mainly used
for QCD but
I found it very nice for other uses ; pity it only compiles on those
Florent Calvayrac |
Professeur Universite du Maine
Lab. de Physique de l'Etat Condense UMR-CNRS 6087
Inst. de Rech. en Ingenierie Molec. et Matx Fonctionnels FR CNRS 2575
More information about the Beowulf