[Beowulf] Teaching Scientific Computation (looking fo the perfect text)

Geoff Jacobs gdjacobs at gmail.com
Wed Nov 21 20:11:09 PST 2007

David Mathog wrote:
> Operator overloading reminds me of Bill Clinton's:
> "It depends what the meaning of 'is' is."  If operator
> overloading is used unwisely, so that the meaning of "+" is not just
> "addition of this type of data", then pity the poor schmuck who has to
> maintain the code.  Unfortunately you don't have to look far for
> data types where there is no single operator overload mapping that
> makes sense.  If A,B,C,D are 3D vectors then + has a single obvious
> meaning, but * is ambiguous, is it a dot product or a cross product?
> That's the point where C++ overloading breaks down, at least for me,
> and a function or #define is easier to work with, something like :
While I love the C preprocessor, I wouldn't look that way for the Fount 
of Code Clarity.

Geoffrey D. Jacobs

To have no errors
   would be life without meaning
   No struggle, no joy

More information about the Beowulf mailing list