[Beowulf] Create cluster : questions
maxenced at gmail.com
Thu Sep 7 08:13:15 PDT 2006
2006/9/7, Ed Hill <ed at eh3.com>:
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 21:23:03 +0200
> "Maxence Dunnewind" <maxenced at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi.
> > i'm a user of the Ubuntu Linux OS, and also a packager for this OS.
> > As you may know , packaging can be take a lot of time, mainly
> > during building process.
> > I would create a public cluster for help packagers. All Ubuntu
> > users can accept we use their computers on the cluster. But the
> > cluster system MUST only use free ressource of this computers (and
> > maybe user could set a quota)...
> > i want people only have to install some software (no kernel
> > compilation or other things).
> > I want know if beowulf could works in this case ????
> Hi Maxence,
> Have you looked at distcc? Its probably closest to what you're
> I help out with Fedora Extras so I can certainly appreciate the time
> that goes into compiling packages! It would be nice to have a
> distributed build system with per-compilation-unit (eg. per-object-
> file) granularity. But I'm afraid it may be a somewhat complicated
> task for, for instance, Fedora Extras since the FE build system uses
> a chroot-ed environment (the "mock" package) to ensure build
> cleanliness and the presence of all the needed dependencies. Maybe
> NFS-mounting the chroot would be sufficient...?
> If you split up the work on a per-package and per-architecture basis
> (i386, x86-64, ppc, etc.) then its relatively (!) straight-forward to
> build a cluster with the necessary hardware and perform builds of
> separate packages/arches on a simultaneous (each in different chroots
> on potentially different machines) basis. Thats exactly what the
> current Fedora Extras build system (called "plague") does. You can
> see some details at:
> And I only discuss Fedora Extras because its what I'm familiar with.
> I'd be curious to hear how build systems work for other distros!
> Edward H. Hill III, PhD | ed at eh3.com | http://eh3.com/
yes i'd take a look at distcc. But distcc seams have a big lack : no
limitation of ressource.
A "fork" of distcc exists : icecream, it seems to have a limitation and do
the same work like distcc.
i don't know exactly what's the best process for sharing compilation : share
all the building process with chroot, or just the compilations proccess into
the chroot ...
http://www.sos-sts.info <=== Entraide étudiante
http://www.ubuntu-fr.org <=== La meilleure distribution Linux :)
maxenced at gmail.com
maxenced at ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Beowulf