[Beowulf] Slightly OT: storage performance
csamuel at vpac.org
Thu Nov 9 20:23:32 PST 2006
On Friday 10 November 2006 09:09, Joe Landman wrote:
> My question is this: apart from using huge file sizes to see raw
> disk performance, what do you considered good performance on the various
> tests, either in the huge file size regime, or in the cache interaction
> regime? Basically which tests are most meaningful to your workloads?
> Are the raw disk data really the most useful datum?
Because of our diversity of users (500+ from 8 separate universities covering
a myriad of fields) we can't really been able to pick anything better than
Bonnie++ so far.
The raw data does seem to give a generally reasonable indication of how well a
system can do I/O, for us at least.
Christopher Samuel - (03)9925 4751 - VPAC Deputy Systems Manager
Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing http://www.vpac.org/
Bldg 91, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20061110/c8523c2c/attachment.bin
More information about the Beowulf