[Beowulf] MS HPC... Oh dear...
ashley at quadrics.com
Mon Jun 12 08:11:36 PDT 2006
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 10:49 -0400, Joe Landman wrote:
> Ashley Pittman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 00:02 -0400, Joe Landman wrote:
> >> What Microsoft will do is to take away as much of this as they can. I
> >> haven't seen it yet, but I believe they will offer MPICH as a DLL, so if
> >> PathScale wants to work along side some other device, you can select
> >> this at runtime, and just have it work. This is a nice idea.
> > Perhaps I've missed something here, what do windows DLLs provide that a
> > linux .so doesn't?
> More to the point, this dynamic binding allows you to write to the API,
> present a consistent ABI, and handle the hardware details elsewhere in a
> driver which can be linked in by the .so/.dll/.eieio method at runtime.
That's exactly what I thought. I was thrown by your "This is a nice
idea" comment because using Windows is no different to Linux in this
More information about the Beowulf