[Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
lindahl at pathscale.com
Sun Jan 29 21:13:59 PST 2006
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 09:36:03PM -0500, Mark Hahn wrote:
> I tend to think of IB as mainly for high-bandwidth, since afaikt its
> latency isn't even as good as myri 2g (mx, 3 us). to say nothing of
> myri 10g, quadrics, numalink, sci.
I know some people don't think of InfiniPath as being InfiniBand, but
really, Mark, I didn't think you were one of them! ;-)
In any case, yes, you are correct for Mellanox InfiniBand HCAs, but
not for InfiniPath.
More information about the Beowulf