[Beowulf] real hard drive failures
shaeffer at neuralscape.com
Tue Jan 25 11:21:21 PST 2005
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 10:16:33AM -0600, Donald Kinghorn wrote:
> WD 120 and 200GB SATA in the field <1 year, [~400 drives] one failure so far.
> I'm moving to a 3 drive raid5 setup on each node (drives are cheap, down time
> is not) and considering changing to Seagate SATA drives anyone care to offer
> opinions or more anecdotes? :-)
For 250 GB SATA drives, I would recommend either Hitachi or Seagate. Hitachi
drives may exhibit nominally better performance numbers.
For 400GB SATA drives, I don't have enough experience to recommend anything,
but I have used 400 GB Hitachi SATA drives recently and all is going well at
this time. It's too early to draw conclusions.
Neuralscape, Palo Alto, Ca. 94306
shaeffer at neuralscape.com http://www.neuralscape.com
More information about the Beowulf