[Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
lindahl at pathscale.com
Tue Nov 9 19:06:27 PST 2004
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 11:45:12PM -0500, Chris Sideroff wrote:
> I have had the luxury of testing an SCI 2D torus cluster and found
> latency performance to be exceptional.
Right. So is that a feature of the NIC, or a feature of the torus
instead of a fat tree/CLOS/CBB network? Answer: the NIC.
There are several examples of low-latency fat tree/CLOS/CBB networks.
More information about the Beowulf