sram, not sdram.

Mark Hahn hahn at
Thu Jan 31 08:22:58 PST 2002

> > personally, 2M seems strangely small for DDR, since it's not 
> > either fast or wide.
> It's an L3, so that's DDR *sram*, not DDR SDRAM. Another system using

no, apple says sdram:
the numbers check, too: it's just your basic pc2100 ddr,
giving a genuine marketing bandwidth of 4.2 GB/s total.

More information about the Beowulf mailing list