charmm scalability on 2.4 kernels

Rob Latham rlatham at
Sun Jan 6 14:44:50 PST 2002

On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 11:55:42PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> On Saturday 05 January 2002 20:10, Steve Fellini wrote:
> This is rather surprising, I'd expect 2.4.x to actually improve upon 2.2.x. 
> It was said before on this list that 2.4 already incorporates TCP fixes. Has 
> anybody met a similar situation before?

it was said before that the tcp fixes don't make any difference.

with 2.2 you'd see some fast times and then a few really really high
times. with 2.4 you get really consitent times that are a bit slower
than the times you'd get with 2.2 + the tcp fixes.


Rob Latham <rlatham at>
Paralogic Inc.  
                                        EAE8 DE90 85BB 526F 3181 
                                        1FCF 51C4 B6CB 08CC 0897 

More information about the Beowulf mailing list