external raid arrays
cblack at EraGen.com
Thu Feb 21 14:38:32 PST 2002
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 04:16:20PM -0600, Dave Wright wrote:
> From your description, the request sizes make a big difference as to how to
> configure a filesystem. You probably want latency not bandwidth. Stripping
> and RAID 3 or 5 will probably be bad. JBOD 0+1 is most likely better. A
> RAID has different performance for different request sizes. Kinda like a
> frequency response.
> You probably want to get into JBOD with 15000rpm scsi drives.
What is JBOD 0+1? I have seen JBOD supported but thought it was "Just
a Bunch of Disks", no striping, mirroring or parity. Why do you say
RAID5 would be bad? From one RAID vendor I heard that there was little
to gain on db servers from going to raid 0+1 other than increased
redundancy. Lots of the operations are not short SQL queries, but
dumps and imports. These are what take a long time and shuffle the
most data around.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20020221/869fe509/attachment.bin
More information about the Beowulf